Apparently an student-led atheist group is giving away free porn in exchange for “Holy Texts” (see video above). The philosophy? Religious texts are both filled with shameful imagery and have led to oppression and violence. Therefore they are in some way on par with pornography.
Without addressing the group’s (deeply flawed) assertions more fully, I find myself at least wondering if they’ve paused to examine the many atrocities that have been committed by those who followed atheistic teachings. And if so, do we have to turn in Mein Kampf, or can we also turn in atheistic seed-planters such as Nietzsche or Heidegger? And if oppression is bad, then why give away a product that is so deliberately dehumanizing?
GLENN BECK AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
But before we can go any further, in roughly the same time frame that this video came out, we got to hear from Glenn Beck on the nature of social justice. Social justice, Beck says, was a common theme of both the communists and the Nazis. He held up the representative flags and said:
“Communists are on the left, and the Nazis are on the right. That’s what people say. But they both subscribe to one philosophy, and they flew one banner. . . . But on each banner, read the words, here in America: ‘social justice.’ They talked about economic justice, rights of the workers, redistribution of wealth, and surprisingly, democracy.”
True, Hitler’s greatest “strength” was in convincing the masses that the most vicious atrocities were actually acts of compassion, and that by eliminating the “undesirables” they were, in some way, doing society a favor. But to confuse this twisting of the ideas of compassion and social justice is a bit much. In the same program Beck targets churches that endorse social justice:
“I’m begging you, your right to religion and freedom to exercise religion and read all of the passages of the Bible as you want to read them and as your church wants to preach them . . . are going to come under the ropes in the next year. If it lasts that long it will be the next year. I beg you, look for the words ‘social justice’ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!”
What both Beck and the “Smut for Smut” campaign miss is the way that social justice has been such a powerful influence on our world.
JUSTICE AND THE SCRIPTURES
Let’s be good students of history. Historically, especially within the last century (give or take a decade or two), many denominations have moved the message of the gospel from the message of the cross to the message of social reform. And, as a reaction to this, many churches have emphasized the message of the cross over the message of social reform. This is why Dallas Willard coined the term “Christian vampires” to refer to those who want Jesus for His blood and nothing else.
But the truth is Christianity demands both theological identity as well as social relevance. When Jesus begins His ministry, He walks into the temple, opens the Bible and quotes Isaiah, saying:
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”
I don’t know how to “spiritualize” that. Nor can I read Jesus’ prescription for us to imitate the behavior of the Good Samaritan without an understanding of the Christian duty to reach out to the broken. In the Hebrew scriptures, Israel is explicitly instructed to “…learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause” (Isaiah 1:17). James tells us that “true religion” is helping the “widows and orphans” (James 1:27).
So we must remember that, yes, there have been those who have misused the text of scripture to perpetrate acts of violence, but even a casual reading of the text tells us that its pages compel us to acts of compassion.
OUR CHRISTIAN HERITAGE
Since we’ve mentioned the Nazis, I feel it’s my duty to mention one of my favorite writers, Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Bonhoeffer stood in opposition to the Nazi regime during WWII, an opposition that would eventually cost him his life. It was Bonhoeffer who said,
“It is not a religious act that makes the Christian, but participation in the sufferings of God in the secular life. That is metanoia [repentance]: not in the first place thinking about one’s own needs, problems, sins and fears, but allowing oneself to be caught up into the way of Jesus Christ….Pain is a holy angel…Through him men have become greater than through all the joys of the world….The pain of longing,which often can be felt physically, must be there, and we shall not and need not talk it away. But it needs to be overcome every time, and thus there is an even higher holier angel than the one of pain, that is the one joy in God.” (Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Letters and Papers from Prison)
It should be equally noted that Bonhoeffer did not advocate social justice alone, but stood against this sort of theological reductionism, even to the contradiction of such strong voices as Barth and Rahner.
Quite similarly, Mark Noll remarks on the strength of Christian witness through acts of mercy and charity:
“Over the long course of Christian history, the most depressing thing – because repeated so often – has been how tragically far short of Christian ideals we ordinary Christians so regularly fall. Over the long course of Christian history, the most remarkable thing – because it is such a miracle of grace – is how often believers have acted against the pride of life to honor Christ. Of all such ‘signs of contradiction,’ the most completely Christlike have been those occasions when believers are strong – because of wealth, education, political power, superior culture, or favored location – have reached out to the despised, the forsaken, the abandoned, the lost, the insignificant, or the powerless.” (Mark Noll, quoted in Michael Novak et al, “Where Would Civilization Be Without Christianity?” Christianity Today, 1999)
GRACE AND GOSPEL
This is not a subject to be avoided, shut away, or exchanged for the denigrating product of pornography, nor is it a subject to be confused with political conspiracies.
Mind you, I write this not “against” (though admittedly in reaction to) anyone. I am instead “for” the grace of Christ, a grace wide enough to welcome the poor, the needy and the broken, and a grace costly enough to invite us to changed lives.
FURTHER RESOURCES
How Christianity Changed the World, Alvin J. Schmidt.
The Hole in Our Gospel, Richard Stearns
Over at Challies.com you can read about a new book, When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor and Yourself.
You can also read my previous post on Social Reconciliation.
Fortunately, radio and television host Glenn Beck doesn’t care much about convenience, he cares about common sense. Branden Christian
“how many atrocities have been committed by those who follow atheist teachings…”
I love it when bible-thumpers use this line, because there are so many thing wrong with making this statement.
1) Hitler was an avowed catholic, not an atheist. (this being the case, can I blame WWII on the christians?)
2) while stalin did call himself an atheist, the soviet regime deified him, so essentially, he was a god/pope/whatever of his own religion, and pursued things with comparable fervor.
3) Let us not forget the 2000 years of atrocities committed in the name of christianity, shall we?
4) Finally, do not quote scripture as if it gives you the moral upper-hand. Your bible is full of infanticide, genocide, slavery, rape, murder, and just about every other atrocity imaginable. The ONLY reason christians aren’t still using it to justify this depravity is that the rest of SECULAR society grew up, and started living moral lives. Once this happened, the bible-waving slave-owners scurried back to their holes and came up with a DIFFERENT way of interpreting the same book of lies it has been leaning on for 2000 years.
Cheers, bro, do some reading before you “cast the first stone” next time.
I’m always willing to have dialogue with those who disagree, so long as that dialogue can find common ground in mutual respect. Unfortunately your comment does not reflect this.
First, terms like “bible-thumper,” “book of lies” and the suggestion to “do some reading” are, at best, dismissive and, at worst, the kinds of ad hominem attacks that only weaken your position.
Nonetheless I will address your points:
(1) Had you read my post a bit more carefully, you’d have noticed that I never said Hitler was an atheist. And you are incorrect; Hitler’s spirituality is debatable at best, so “avowed Catholic” isn’t the best description. His philosophies more closely resembled those of the philosophers of his day (and before), predicated on reductive materialism rather than Christianity.
(2) This is one example. You again ignore the many atrocities of Pol Pot and Maoist China. And as before, whatever religious/philosophical title is used, the underlying philosophy comes from atheistic sources.
(3) Again, (did you read my post?) had you read more carefully, you’d have noticed that I did not ignore this point, nor have others. My point was that Christianity has been a powerful force for change in the world.
(4) This is incorrect. The “secularization thesis” has been demonstrated as incorrect. Christianity has actually fluorished in the developed world. Your slavery example oversimplifies a complex period of our nation’s history and fails to address the questions of authority surrounding that debate.
It is irresponsible to castigate Christian spirituality and assume that atheism (or at least secularity) provides a better solution, for in so doing you have ignored the contributions of Christianity to the world, the very heart of this post.
Finally, even if you are correct, then two questions arise: (1) why fight oppressive religion with more oppression? Are you not then guilty of the same crimes of which you accuse others? and (2) In the present example, if the Bible is such a disturbing book, why replace it with pornography, which invariably denigrates its performers and users?
I’ll recommend a book to you that may help you better understand these issues: Tim Keller, The Reason for God. I hope that you are better able to engage in further dialogue. Thanks for stopping by.